February 09, 2010
Why I Am a Catholic Republican
by Deal W. Hudson   
9/13/07

I'm not a Republican because I think Republicans are fun or especially good company. If I were looking for sociality or cordiality in my political party, I would look elsewhere.

I would also look elsewhere if the GOP ever turned its back on the issues that brought me into its fold in the first place: pro-life and pro-family matters. There is no question that the Republican Party and its platforms over the past 30 years have been closer to Catholic teaching on these issues than those of the Democrats.

When the Catholic apologists for the Democratic Party start to talk about poverty as the primary cause of abortion, they are merely spinning. When they point at the support of some GOP leaders for the death penalty, they are spinning. When they talk about "Bush's War" they are spinning, and when they call the GOP "the party of the rich," they are spinning.

Democrats make all this noise to distract attention from the simple fact (a fact well-documented by former Democratic activist David Carlin in Can a Catholic Be a Democrat?, Sophia Press, 2005) that the animating vision of their party is being supplied by 1960s radicals turned post-modernists. "Marriage is only a social construct" is the kind of thing that tells me all I need to know about Democrats. Their philosophy is simply bad.

Republicans aren't perfect. Okay, I said it. There is always the possibility they will toss aside their Reagan-Bush patrimony for the sake of keeping the White House. Then the Catholic and Evangelical voice will become a voice of dissent within the GOP.

The GOP is a coalition of religious and social conservatives, economic conservatives, libertarians, and pro-business interests. The fault lines between the various groups are always visible and always in danger of widening.

What all of these groups have in common, however, is a sensible philosophy and an appreciation, at least, for the contribution of religion to human institutions. In other words, the deposit of natural law can be found emanating from the soul of the GOP.

When and if the GOP gives up its defense of life and marriage and makes faux-tolerance the summit of the virtues, at that point it will no longer matter what party you belong to. The only argument between the parties will be how much of our money should be spent on programs for social engineering.

If I sound detached, it's because I have learned to be. There is the politics of Aristotle and the politics of America in the 21st century -- and they aren't the same. One instructs us on the wisdom of applying first principles to government; the other is where we struggle to keep our first principles in view.

The GOP is my political home because it comports most closely with my Catholic faith and its most basic principles. The great divide between the Democrats and the GOP is not tax cuts or the war in Iraq. These are prudential judgments that an administration and a Congress must make -- they are not violations of principle. There will be taxes and there will be wars.

The Democrats treat matters of prudential judgment as if they were principles. That's because they have abandoned principles and put habits of prudential judgments in their place: Spend more money on "programs," tax the "rich" to pay for them, and blame America for the ills of the world.

Republicans may not always make the best prudential judgments, but they still hold onto the basic vision of human rights as stated in the Declaration. Those three inalienable rights are the core of the natural law tradition upon which this nation was founded, a tradition with religious roots.

Republicans still know the government cannot provide happiness for its citizenry; it can only make possible our right of pursuing it. Good government creates the conditions for the ordinate exercise of liberty and the pursuit of happiness. But neither of these rights can exist without a life to bear them.

When that right -- the right to life -- is denied, then anything becomes morally possible, even a culture of death. And when a political party has become the "party of death," as Ramesh Ponnuru believes the Democrats have (The Party of Death: the Democrats, the Media, the Courts, and the Disregard of Human Life, Regnery, 2006), it cannot be a viable platform for social renewal.

Republicans have kept a sound philosophy underlying their politics; they have not yet taken the postmodern turn contra naturam. We can credit the infusion of conservative Christians into the GOP over the past 40 years with keeping the party from going the way of the Democrats. I was one of that breed, and I will remain so as long as the GOP stays on course.

Deal W. Hudson is the director of InsideCatholic.com and the author of
Onward, Christian Soldiers: The Growing Political Power of Catholics and Evangelicals in the United States (Simon and Schuster, March 2008).
 
Readers have left 13 comments.
   Quote(1) private citizen
January 14th, 2008 | 6:24pm
Deal Hudson is decidedly correct in his assertion that life principles supported by Republicans take precedence over policy issues for peace, justice and poverty supported by either party. By recognition of Catholic principles first and preferred policy second, we remain steadfast in support of our beliefs. We need to make voting decisions based on principles, which are doctrine of 2000 yrs of Christianity and Mosaic Law for another 3000+ prior to Christ. That is not to say we toss out our belief in the corporal works of mercy, we just priortize protection of life
over liberty and pursuit of happiness, just as Jefferson wrote it (first)
Democrats try to sound the policy issue over principle. Until they get it turned around, they do not have a course I can support as a Catholic.
 Written by Jill Lagergren
   Quote(2) Some thoughts
January 21st, 2008 | 8:52pm
Hi Mr. Hudson--

I'd like to add my own reason for being a Catholic Conservative who has always voted Republican, if I may.

At this time in the US, poverty is typically a result of behavior. One drinks oneself out of a job. One fornicates and, if the babe is lucky, has one or more children out of wedlock. One chooses to quit high school. The list goes on.

Yet one can also turn one's life around, given hard work and much self-discipline. I know, because I have done it. One needn't be hooked into the "right" people to break out of poverty, nor does one have to violate any law. One does, however, have to bear the burden of past sin and work to make it right.

The welfare state would have us believe that the US citizens in "poverty" are there by no fault of their own. The truth, however, is the opposite. If one has reached the age of legal emancipation, one is ultimately responsible for how one lives.

Yes there are tragedies--accidents, unexpected deaths as such--and society should by all means help those suffering from unexpected tragedies. But there's nothing unexpected about living in a slum when one has fornicated, lied, drugged oneself into a state of vegetation, etc. It's called consequences.

Liberals, or whatever name they choose to call themselves, deny that consequences exist and wail that those of us who reap the rewards of self-discipline and hard work are really to blame for the lot of the poor.

While that explanation may work in Zimbabwe, it doesn't work here--pun intended.

Until the poor accept their own culpability for their economic situation, there is no amount of money on the planet that will help them.

 Written by Marie Elks
   Quote(3) Atheists & Manipulation versus Faithful & Self - Discipline
February 16th, 2008 | 10:12pm
I am Catholic and Republican because the choices in life are somewhat 'clear' to me:
Atheists & Manipulation (Democrats) versus Faithful & Self - Discipline (Republicans).
Now, that sounds somewhat extreme perhaps...a little too black and white, too general, too judgmental, maybe? Maybe. However, it seems to me that you can measure the quality of the INTENT of politicians like Hillary Clinton from simply watching how she intentionally manipulates the public. It also seems you can measure your own FAITH in God by your INTENT to "stay on the straight and narrow path..." as they say, and perhaps how often you PRAY for guidance, for forgiveness, and give thanks when you get those.
When you just follow your "gut" feelings about which direction is going to be GOOD for you, for us and for God...you will surely find this is not a popularity contest; it is Life itself. You can choose to be guided by God, or by the most "popular" positions. I'm finding that life is going by really quickly, and I suspect that the moments of a person's death bring all this into clarity; at least it should for those who hope to be going somewhere afterwards........
Vote with your heart. Pray with everything you have.
 Written by John Wiant
   Quote(4) Exactly Right!! amdg
April 11th, 2008 | 1:40am
Mr.Hudson is infallibly correct. I am only 22yrs old, so I am still new to many things in this world, but what I do know is God and Mankind are intricately connected. I am a roman catholic republican from a protestant democratic home. I am on the front lines of this basic distinction everyday. I feel my family thinks I am a "know it all". I dont feel that way, I do feel the need to express my faith in all that I do, and being a republican is one way I do this. I don't think all democrates are "evil" or depraved in anyway. Many, many of them are successful,law-abiding,God loving people. Not everyone will share the same views on the vast issues of life(both spiritual and material). In fact there are democrates and protestants I deeply respect. Al Gore is one of them.
 Written by Barrett Wissell
   Quote(5) Great article, rings true for me
August 05th, 2008 | 5:07pm
M rHudson,

Your article rings true for me. I am a Reagan Republican but a Catholic first. Precisely because the GOP stands for life and family (albeit imperfectly) is why I have always voted for them in national elections.

Yet, every four years I get disillusioned enough to consider going for a purer third party (such as the Constitution Party) because I know the GOP's imperfections. However, what brings me back to the GOP fold are two things: 1) the looming evil that the party of death candidate would bring upon us if elected (ie, Obama this year) and 2) the fact that voting for a purer third party with no chance of winning just might facilitate the rise of said party of death candidate. It all comes down to the old saying: Don't let the perfect become the enemy of the good.

If the GOP strays from its pro-life/pro-family, strong national defense planks, then I will leave it for the more perfect party. Ultimately, we must try to bring about the social reign of Christ the King in the temporal order.
 Written by Sam
   Quote(6) Untitled
August 12th, 2008 | 4:58pm
For all the loyal Republicans asserting why social issues are the reason to go that way, I offer Thomas Frank's succinct summary of how the GOP treats social conservatives: They vote to stop abortion, they get tax cuts for rich people.
Dick Cheney said it best in late 2002, when he told Paul O'Neill, the then-Treasury Secretary, that another tax cut was in the works. O'Neill was concerned, in view of budget deficits and the looming Iraq War.
"Reagan proved deficits don't matter," Cheney replied. Besides, he added, the Republicans had just won the 2002 off-year elections, and a tax cut would be "a reward for our base."
Note the reward wasn't a stepped-up push against abortion, an anti-gay crusade, or something of that nature.
 Written by Bill Kurtz
   Quote(7) This is disingenous
August 13th, 2008 | 2:47pm
The Republicans have only paid lip service to so-called "pro-life" advocates. Where are the advances in this arena that should have been seen by now, after nearly 30 years of Republican rule?

Politicians are politicians. They tell people what they want to hear. You forget that at your peril.

The Republican Party does not equal Catholic orthodoxy.
 Written by Alicia
   Quote(8) Untitled
August 13th, 2008 | 3:02pm
I agree, the Republican party does not equal Catholic orthodoxy. But i don't think a faithful Catholic can vote Democrat this time around. Pope Benedict said our number one priority should be the defense of life, and second the defense of the family. Obama's attitudes are exactly the opposite of what they ought to be. Will the Republicans go so far as they ought to? No. But at least they represent our views to some extent, instead of ridiculing them.
 Written by Mary
   Quote(9) Pro-life Platform
August 29th, 2008 | 1:51am
http://www.gop.com/media/2004platform.pdf

I believe that the Republican Party's Platform is still pro-life and will continue to be in '08. The same cannot be said of the Democrat's platform.
 Written by Andrew
   Quote(10) Liberal Democratic Confusion
September 02nd, 2008 | 9:29pm
I would really like to understand how the Democratic party (Leaders especially) can say God is on their side when they are so Pro Abortion.
They had the nerve to say God was on their side for the weather they experienced during the Obama speech in the outside stadium, and then I hear an add on the radio stating John McCain threatens the lives of women because if he had it his way he would overturn abortion rights. What about the babies’ rights? No logical mind can say abortion is not killing. When people plant seeds they start to grow, and then if they wilt, they say they died, how are embryos different???
They can not have it both ways; you can NOT have God on your side and agree with killing babies. It is totally hypercritical, just like many twisted liberal views working in the GRAY ZONE!!!! Please have them explain this, I am anxious to hear their answer and be enlightened!
 Written by John
   Quote(11) Death Penalty and War
January 19th, 2009 | 3:37pm
I came upon this posting now, and I can definitely agree with it. I am ashamed of the Catholic Democrat politicians who, after selling out to appease as much of the crowd as possible, loudly proclaim their Catholic faith. It's understandable to be a Democrat on economic issue (albeit no better than a fiscal conservative - IMO), but any Catholic who tried to justify voting Democrat b/c of that is lying to themselves.

The main issues that Pelosi-types use to justify their hypocrisy are poverty, death penalty, and war. Economics is such a loose-cannon and imprecise science that taking either side does not mean much, although you can argue that more social programs benefit the poor (if you ignore the corrupt process and system of priorities they go through before they are passed).

Then Cardinal Ratzinger, now the Pope, said "There may be a legitimate diversity of opinion even among Catholics about waging war and applying the death penalty, but not however with regard to abortion and euthanasia." In fact, war and the death penalty were not frowned upon before Pope John Paul II's Evangelium Vitae.
 Written by Ray Murphy
   Quote(12) for a healthy society
April 24th, 2009 | 12:29pm
I am a Roman Catholic living in the New York / New Jersey area. I support Pro-Life. As long as the mother's life is in no danger, and if the child is healthy, abortion should not be allowed. Life is a special gift from God. Only He can give life and only He decides when it should end. Also, marriage is only meant to be between one man and one woman. That is what's natural, and that is how God intends it to be. If you are a man then you should remain a man - if you are a woman then you should remain a woman. Period. Another point to be made is people should of course always respect the country they live in. There is only one basic way a society can be successful and prosperous. Good family values, respect for elders, respect for your neighbor, respect your flag, and always having good ethical practices in our professional aa well as personal lives. Only this type of society can be healthy. Furthermore, there are the three loves we Croatian-Americans were taught growing up. The three loves we need to uphold are: Love for God, love for family, and love for country. God Bless!
 Written by Alen Glavan
   Quote(13) Yes, But
January 23rd, 2010 | 6:48pm
Yes, the Republican Party does fit in well with our Catholic faith; yet I'm sure the Pope (and my local bishop) would disagree on some (but not all) of its members' stand on the death penalty. Also, every church I've entered, I hear the priest talking about "just wages" and "health care". I think that's why most of the people in any given Catholic church are going to vote Democratic...especially new immigrants. But the Republican Party is a "big tent" and all people are welcome. Years ago, one would never hear of Catholics in the Republican Party...or Jewish Republicans, but today, the conservative, moral principles of the Party appeal to many types of people.
 Written by Bob Foss

RULES FOR COMMENTS: We want to host a constructive but civil discussion among mature adults. With that in mind:

1. No name calling or personal attacks; stick to the argument, not the individual.

2. Assume the goodwill of the other person, especially when you disagree.

3. Don't make judgments about the other person's sinfulness or salvation. You are not the Inquisition.

4. Within reason, stick to the topic of the thread; no conversation hijackers, please.

5. Encouraging or threatening violence against anyone will get you banned immediately.

6. If you don't agree to the rules, don't post.

We reserve the right to block or edit (tone, not content) any posts that violate our usage rules. And we will freely ban any commenters unwilling to abide by them.

Finally, our comments are moderated so there may be a delay between the time when you submit your comment and the time when it appears.

Your Name :
Title For Your Post :
Optional: Your Website (NOT your email address) :
      
[smiley=angry][smiley=cool][smiley=evil][smiley=happy][smiley=laugh][smiley=sad][smiley=shock][smiley=think][smiley=tongue][smiley=wink]
Comment(s) :

SPAM Check: Please delete the sentence above BEFORE you press 'Submit.' That lets us know you're a real person and not an automated junk mail Spammer.
 
Currently no polls available to vote
Advertisement
 
Copyright 2007, Morley Publishing Group Inc. | 2100 M Street NW, #170-339 | Washington, D.C. 20037
about us | the inside blog | crisis magazine | morley institute | ic store | support us
fus grad 2009
Envoy Banner 52 Meditations
Belmont Abbey Lent 2010