|
| The Slow Death of Radical Feminism |
| by Marjorie Campbell |
| 5/23/08 |
|
Blessedly brief, Pollitt's diatribe brought to mind Erma Bombeck's reaction to a Betty Friedan speech: "We were too intimidated to laugh and too old to cry. We sat there stunned." And Pollitt is stunning in her vehemence. Stretching a comparison of the abuse of teen girls within the recently raided Texas compound of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (FLDS) and the moral teachings of the Catholic Church on sexuality, Pollitt asserts:
If it was up to Benedict, we might be more stylish than the plural wives of the FLDS, but we'd be trapped in marriage and have 15 children just like them. FLDS men have many wives and the pope has none, which goes to show there's more than one way to keep women pregnant and in their place.
Pollitt simply cannot intend this as a factual assertion. She is too educated, too well-published not to know at least minimally the nature of the Church's objections to the contraceptive, aborting mentality of today's Western culture. While Pollitt may never have read Humanae Vitae or Mulieris Dignitatem -- or any of the other rich, philosophical Church documents regarding love, marriage, women, and reproduction -- she's not stupid.
How, then, is Pollitt unable to distinguish a small, allegedly abusive cult in remote Texas from a 2,000-year-old, 1.2-billion-strong, worldwide religious movement that has produced women like Catherine of Siena, Caryll Houselander, Sigrid Undset, Mother Teresa, Elizabeth Fox-Genovese, and Mary Ann Glendon, to name a few? How does she leap from rebuking the "FLDS' extreme male dominance" to berating the media "lovefest" with "Benedict's intellect, charm and elegant red shoes" during his recent United States visit?
And why the vitriol with which she willingly, perhaps purposefully, obscures fact, hatefully lashing out at a cultural enclave deeply cherished and defended by millions of the same women on whose behalf she claims to argue? For a person who believes that women, not the government, are best suited to make a decision regarding abortion, Pollitt certainly vents a breathtaking lack of faith in Catholic women's ability to make spiritual and moral decisions for themselves.
An ardent atheist who "can't stand to be in a religious service," Pollitt may simply share the same passion that drives "kill God" advocates like Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins. Indeed, the depth of her scorn toward the pope strangely mirrors Hitchens's own dark crusade against Mother Teresa.
But even accounting for this effect, I suspect a deeper determination drives her rancor. It is the deathly determination, undergirding the entire radical feminist sexual agenda, that a woman's womb and her reproductive capacity are an evolutionary accident at best and, at worst, the cause by which she is "fated to be subjected, owned and exploited like the Nature whose magical fertility she embodies" (The Second Sex, Simone de Beauvoir).
The female rejection of her womb remains a critical component of radical feminism, which insists that women merely "happen to be the people who give birth" (The Feminist Mystique, Betty Friedan) and that the capacity to bear children must be managed and subjugated to the higher, worthier (formerly male) callings of profession and paycheck. A woman's reproductive capacity, the radical feminists have always insisted, is an often burdensome biological function that has oppressed women, impeding their material and professional success.
Tools like contraception and abortion, then, can and should be readily employed to neutralize the misfortunes of the womb -- and women should be forced by education and policy to pursue "truly challenging work" and "economic independence." Earning a paycheck, according to the "enlightened" radical feminists, is woman's only path to "equality and human dignity" (The Feminine Mystique). Pollitt's diatribe echoes and continues this shrill insistence that women's identities derive no import or meaning from their capacity to bring forth life.
Thus does Pollitt riddle her short column with references to pregnancy and motherhood as "trapping," "controlling," and "keeping" women "in their place." Women with multiple children particularly offend Pollitt's sensibilities, recalling Simone de Beauvoir's description of such women as "not so much mothers as fertile organisms, like fowls with high egg-production." That women might indeed find fulfillment through their gender-unique reproductive and nurturing capacity -- the very theme and proposition of Pope John Paul II's Mulieris Dignitatem -- can provoke blind rage in women who have so deeply and permanently invested in rejecting these feminine traits to pursue more "manly" pursuits.
Here, then, is the source of Pollitt's unlikely correlation: Any behavior or reflection suggestive of the "myth" that relates female identity and meaning to the birth of a child is suspect. Pollitt can thus lump together the statutory rape and underage sexual activity suspected at the FLDS ranch and the Catholic Church's pro-life teachings as in-kind schemes to make "women . . . baby machines controlled by powerful older men in the name of God."
But as young women today embrace their femaleness, fecundity and all (as witnessed in the writings of Dawn Eden, Elizabeth Fox-Genovese, Miriam Grossman, and Wendy Shalit, to name a few), Pollitt has surely noticed dwindling support for her campaign for "contraception, condoms, divorce and abortion" -- goals she insists are "human rights," but which women increasingly see as means for the abdication of male responsibility.
The heady days of commanding open the doors of Oz have passed, and Pollitt and her peers grow ever less relevant to the real world in which young women live.
Marjorie Campbell is an attorney and speaker on social issues from a Catholic perspective. She lives in San Francisco with her family and blogs at www.dealwhudson.typepad.com. Readers have left 16 comments. Well put, Marjorie. In addition to the rage felt by women who reject their reproductive capacity, I see a great deal of contempt and blame towards those who do willingly embrace the whole of womanhood. I can't help but think this arises, in part, from the need to justify the choices they've made, and the identities they've formed around their philosophies, commitments and causes. Written by Zoe Romanowsky Pollitt has surely noticed dwindling support for her campaign for "contraception, condoms, divorce and abortion" -- goals she insists are "human rights," but which women increasingly see as means for the abdication of male responsibility. — Marjorie CampbellI find it absurd that these feminists don't ever realize that they don't gain anything by securing these "rights," especially abortion. All they do is give men more freedom from responsibility, and end up lowering their own standards to the level of the men they can't stand. Written by Nathan Cushman Good article, but let's be honest. There really are two false assumptions made by radical feminism: 1) All men are jocks, millionaires, and sexual perverts. 2) If women are to be respected, they must become jocks, millionaires, and sexual perverts. I'm exaggerating to prove a point, of course, but doesn't it sometimes seem like this is exactly what radical feminists are thinking? Anyway, ever since I was twelve or thirteen, I've noticed that some women seem to view life through such mud-colored glasses, resented it, and been tempted to despair of the possibility of relating to women because of it. And do note that I say "tempted," not "succumbed." Written by Michael Healy, Jr. My Grandmother always encouraged me to dream big and study hard. She never bad mouthed men the way modern feminists do in articles like the one referenced. Grandma would have considered me a feminist, but these modern feminists certainly do not! The writings of John Paul II about women, marriage and fertility are all so very deeply pro-woman that I am amazed that women like this Pollitt cannot see the truth of it. I wasn't born Catholic, but the respect for women I have experienced inside the Catholic church--respect for them as mothers, as caretakers AS WELL AS respect for them as Doctors and Lawyers and Educators--in short, respect for women as complete beings--far outstrips as environment I have ever been in. Not even in Graduate School did I experience this level of respect. As a Catholic woman, I find the expectation is: of course I have children AND of course I have a brain, an education and the ability to apply both to job and family. Feminism today demands that I cut off my capacity to have children OR ELSE they will refuse to recognize my brains and education--my response to that is unprintable. I loved Wendy Shallit's books. And will have to look for more articles by Campbell. These new girls on the block really rock! ![]() Written by Ann The good news is that feminists of Pollitt's stripe are breeding (or rather, not breeding) themselves out of existence. The next generation certainly won't learn this sort of thought from their mothers. Written by Andy Well, given the broken family I grew up in, the person I have the deepest connection to, family-wise, is my mother. Being a female engineer in the late 1970s, she sued her employer for gender-based pay discrimination and won. However, that kind of equality would mean nothing to radical feminists, because she also has five children. The fact that my mother lived the very life that created so many radical feminists, and rejected that entire point-of-view because it conflicted with her convictions about God highlights the origin of the movement. It is thus incredibly misfortunate that my sister has fallen into their orbit. Written by Scott Hebert The writings of John Paul II about women, marriage and fertility are all so very deeply pro-woman that I am amazed that women like this Pollitt cannot see the truth of it. — Ann![]() Scott, your last comment really tugged on my heart and sent me back up to Ann's reference to JP II writings on women and "the truth of it". Having myself spent years living the radical feminism "faith" system, I know personally (1) how difficult it can be to start asking - and answering - the tough questions that do naturally nag most women within that "orbit" and (2) how much happier life becomes when a woman can live in harmony, rather than battle, with her nature. I still have friends participating in various degrees with radical feminism and I have compassion for them. I try to focus on the anger and unhappiness so many experience and whether it seems "fair" to them that women's reproductivity, not male fertility, is treated by culture and industry as a commercial enterprise, to be manipulated, controlled, medicated, rejected and denigrated. "What's wrong with us just the way we are?", I often ask these "liberated" women. This is the essence, in my opinion, of our sex-unique God-given dignity ~ and we've allowed a thought-movement to convince even our youngest women that their reproductivity is a disposable nuisance that must be "managed" so that it does not interfere in "life". And just WHOSE life would that be? I will keep your sister in my prayers. Written by Marjorie Campbell Joan of Ark was the youngest Commander in Chief in the history of the world, she was Catholic, and she was a woman. Written by tex Andy's right...all the angry young mena and women are angry old men and women. As one who tried it their way, realized it was destroying families and jeopardizing children's safety (they get pushed so far down the priority list, see)The shriller this woman screams, the more desperate she gets. I will pray that God touch her heart. Written by Abby How sad. These dinosaurs don't even realize how pathetic and desperate they really are. How sad. Written by Mark I see these women all too often, alone with their little dogs and so bitter, vicious. The damage their mindset has done is STAGGERING. When the innocent and most vulnerable cannot get haven in the womb in which they were meant to be cherished, then there is no love in the world. This world needs love more than anything else, but children, the weak, the sick and the dying are treated with contempt and now we have generations of young people who do not know what it is to love. At its best, feminism was meant to get a hearing in male circles for the concerns of the innocent, the weak, the children. It was meant to give a voice to the voiceless and make women's concerns heard. Instead it is responsible for the most bloodshed ever seen in the history of the world, and not of the ones with a voice, strength and power, but the very ones women were supposedly giving voice to their needs for. A true travesty from one end to the other. I used to subscribe to much of the radical feminist ideology. It led me to make horrible decisons, such as getting a tubal ligation and eventually becoming a sex worker. My experiences as a stripper were so devastating that they forced me to confront the direction my lifestyle and philosophy were taking me, and I became a Roman Catholic. Now I know what authentic femininity is as opposed to this Marxist, anti-woman nonsense. My full testimony is on www.savedfromstripclubs.org. I, too, used to subscribe to this nonsense. It led me to divorcing my husband and leaving my children to live on my own for a time. I will regret that for the rest of my life. My children have since forgiven me and we have good relationships now. I cannot think of that time in my life without feeling much pain. Loving human relationships are fundamentally more important than any "earthly success." Written by anonymous My full testimony is on www.savedfromstripclubs.org. — PamExcellent website! Written by Michael Healy, Jr. Pam, Thanks for sharing your inspiring story and your website. Can I ask you to pray for Theresa, a friend of my daughter, who is caught up in stripclub life? I will direct her family to your website. Written by Kathy Women and men are to be at each other's side, not thorns in them. People need to realize that abortion and contraception are industries which like most today have little or no care for anything but profits. Industires jump on such things as radical feminism or whatever it is at the moment and seize the opportunity. Education is the key to understanding what the consequences or anything is, but people just don't take the time, like the original author attacking the Pope and LDS. She needs to go back to school. Written by Terik Ororke |




![[smiley=cool]](http://insidecatholic.com/Joomla/components/com_jreactions/custom/templates/blog/smileys/smiley_cool.gif)
I will keep your sister in my prayers.


