The next man in the White House will have to do something no president has had to do since Nixon: Focus on food. Food policy is central to energy independence, the environment and health care -- all issues the new president will have to address. 

The way we currently grow, produce, process, package and transport food uses more fossil fuel than any other sector of the economy, except the auto industry. It also contributes nearly 40 per cent of the greenhouse gases we produce. And when it comes to health care, we shell out 10 per cent more than we did in 1960 to keep ourselves well -- in large part due to the expense of preventable chronic diseases.

Journalist and author Michael Pollan addresses all this in an article written to "Mr. President-Elect” in The New York Times, published on October 12. Pollan's piece, though lengthy, is one I wish everyone would read. He does a great job outlining the way our current food system works and how it got to where it is today. Some excerpts:

The current food system -- characterized by monocultures of corn and soy in the field, and cheap calories of fat, sugar, and feedlot meat on the table -- is not simply the product of the free market. Rather it is the product of a specific set of government policies that sponsored a shift from solar (and human) energy on the farm to fossil-fuel energy.

[snip]

Cheap energy... enabled the creation of monocultures, and monocultures in turn vastly increased the productivity both of the American land and the American farmer... This did not occur by happenstance. After World World 11, the government encouraged the conversion of the munitions industry to fertilizer -- ammonium nitrate being the main ingredient of both bombs and chemical fertilizer -- and the conversion of nerve-gas research to pesticides.

The government also began subsidizing commodity crops, paying farmers by the bushel for all the corn, soybeans, wheat and rice they could produce... The chief result...was a flood of cheap grain what could be sold for substantially less than it cost farmers to grow because a government check helped make up the difference.

As Pollan points out, the era of cheap, oil-based food is drawing to a close. Even if we wanted to pay the environmental and health price to keep it the way it is, we simply aren’t going to have the cheap fuel -- or the water -- to do so.

But every crisis provides an opportunity, and Pollan recommends three principles to guide a 21^st century food system:

• Focus on quality and diversity (and not just quantity) of the calories  we produce and consume
• Improve the resilience, safety, and security of the food supply by (among other things) promoting regional food economies
• Reconceive agriculture as part of the solution to environmental problems

Pollan also addresses some of the harder questions, such as the matter of whether or not the world can be fed with a decentralized food system. And he has some specific suggestions for the next president about how to turn things around, including following Eleanor Roosevelt’s example. In 1943, Roosevelt planted a garden at the White House sparking the “Victory Garden Movement,” which helped feed the nation during wartime.

Here's the article again. (It may require registering to read.) Do print it out, read it over the weekend, and tell me what you think. 

One person has commented on this article.

   Quote(1) Sounds reasonable enough.
October 16th, 2008 | 4:38pm

Driving from Detroit to Peoria over the summer, I noticed it was all cornfields and soybean fields. The field owners seemed to be in a propaganda war over which was more awesomely patriotic: soy biodiesel or ethanol.

Bring back Freedom to Farm, I say!

 Written by Joe Marier

RULES FOR COMMENTS: We want to host a constructive but civil discussion among mature adults. With that in mind: 1. No name calling or personal attacks; stick to the argument, not the individual. 2. Assume the goodwill of the other person, especially when you disagree. 3. Don't make judgments about the other person's sinfulness or salvation. You are not the Inquisition. 4. Within reason, stick to the topic of the thread; no conversation hijackers, please. 5. Encouraging or threatening violence against anyone will get you banned immediately. 6. If you don't agree to the rules, don't post. We reserve the right to block or edit (tone, not content) any posts that violate our usage rules. And we will freely ban any commenters unwilling to abide by them. Finally, our comments are moderated so there may be a delay between the time when you submit your comment and the time when it appears.

Your Name :

Title For Your Post :

Optional: Your Website (NOT your email address) :

Text ColorAquaBlackBlueFuchsiaGrayGreenLimeMaroonNavyOlivePurpleRedSilverTealWhiteYellow

Comment(s) : [quote=Mark Young]As for domestic violence hysteria, See: Respecting Accuracy in Domestic Abuse Reporting - mediaradar.org This article and some of the comments remind me of the devil's trick to make Eve QUESTION what the LORD told her in the Garden of Eden when he said, "you will not surely die" (if you eat the forbidden fruit). Or of the current Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi's response when asked recently on The View, why she took impeachment off the table, "IF some can show evidence of a crime..." (by the executive branch), as if she were unaware of Representative Kucinich's Thirty-five articles of impeachment. The reviewer and some above are questioning whether Baskerville has exaggerated in "Taken Into Custody". What he describes can be hard to accept for those unaffected by the totalitarian family court system. As an exiled, but FIT and CARING father whose three kids were brainwashed against me, I was forced into bankruptcy, had my drivers license suspended, my career derailed, and spent a total of nine months in jail for civil disobedience to illegal, uncontitutional sole custody orders by which the state of Virginia stole my kids, exactly as Stephen describes in his book, I assure you every word he speaks is true and accurate, with absolutely no exaggerations. I lived and still suffer from what he describes, and I know hundreds of other victimized parents, mostly fathers, whose fundamental right to be a parent has been stripped from them by this evil family law system. God's first Institution: Family, can best be saved by firmly establishing in family courts the same principle cited in our Declaration of Independence by which African-Americans, women, and others have been elevated: EQUALITY, a self-evident, unalienable right. Just as the slave trade and economy existed by denial of racial equality, the divorce/family destruction industry and economy are based on denial of gender equalily in most family dissolutions. Both involve human trafficking at the outset. Though fit mothers are occasionally victims of state-sponsored child abductions, the vast majority of sole custody orders are issued against fit fathers, who receive the shock and awe treatment by judge imposters from the moment they step into their secretive courtrooms. The system purposely tilts the scales of justice by denial of due processs in order to create and perpetuate family law litigation, and thus profits for the divorce industry. The shock and awe practices of our family courts described in "Taken Into Custody" are the real terrorist threat to our nation. WAKE UP AND SMELL THE FASCISM. youtube.com/markyoung12 ExiledFathers.org [/quote]

SPAM Check: Please delete the sentence above BEFORE you press 'Submit.' That lets us know you're a real person and not an automated junk mail Spammer.

J! Reactions 1.09.04 • Professional Site License
Copyright © 2006 S. A. DeCaro