You May Remember the Reformation

by Mark P. Shea

9/28/07

Display Full Article/Printer Friendly | Send to a Friend   What to my wondering eyes appears on my computer screen today but a big advertisement from something called "Paula White Ministries." It has that sort of Oprah vibe to it that many non-denominational women's ministries do. Unlike the martial sense one gets from male-run Evangelical outfits that are about "Fighting for the Truth!" and "Making an Impact on This Generation for Jesus Christ!," Oprah-fied non-denominational women's ministries tend to make you think of The View or Cawfee Tawk or Susan Powter -- plus Jesus.   So what's Paula all about? Well, at present, she is inadvertently illustrating that Catholic teaching is a boomerang. When you throw some of it away, it tends to come back and hit you in the head from unexpected angles.   Let me explain.   Ms. White is calling the faithful of her 23,000-strong Without Walls Church to celebrate "The Day of Atonement" by "Honoring God's Sacred Covenant." That would be Yom Kippur. That's right, a Protestant minister is urging her flock to place themselves under the Law of Moses. How does this happen?   As non-denominationalism becomes more and more restless with the simple bromides of pop-Evangelical culture and starts probing into the remote past before the founding of Calvary Chapel, what often arises is a misbegotten attempt to jump in by leaping over 2,000 years of development of Sacred Tradition. No small number of Evangelicals has the notion that to graft something in Hebrew or Latin into a worship service is to magically be "rooted in history." Indeed, there has been, for a growing number of non-denominational Christians, a fascination with things like the "Jewish roots" movement, which often attempts to re-create the New Testament church through the lens of present-day Jewish life and culture.   Now there is much that is praiseworthy about that. Properly understood, Christianity has not only the right but the responsibility to locate itself squarely in the stream of revelation that begins with Abraham and flows through the Old Testament. It was the heretic Marcion who fancied that Jesus was just kidding when He said He had not come to abolish but fulfill the law and the prophets. The New Testament not only must not be, but cannot be understood apart from the revelation to Israel.   But the whole point is (or should be) that this stream of revelation flows into the New Testament and finds its fulfillment in Christ and in the Church He established and guides through history. When that fulfillment occurs, the Church is rightly bidden to turn from the shadow to the reality, just as the traveler who seeks Seattle is bidden to go to Seattle and not park his car at the road sign reading "Seattle -- 50 miles," build a house, and devote his life to the road sign. As Jesus said to His mistaken contemporaries, "You search the scriptures, because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness to me" (Jn 5:39).   Running Back to the Law?   The Old Testament matters because it is the preparation for Christ. But apart from Him, it cannot save. So on the one hand, the Old Testament retains permanent validity for the Church as the inspired word of God that refers us to Christ. But on the other hand, whole letters like Romans, Galatians, and Hebrews are written reminding Christians they are not bound by Jewish ceremonial law once the Christ it foreshadows brings the salvation it could only prefigure. Prev - Next >> Page 1 2